Physics / Gravity by Coincidence Pendulum
FREE TO EXPLORE
EXPERIMENT 37 · PHYSICS LABORATORY

Gravity by Coincidence Pendulum lab report

A worked gravity by coincidence pendulum lab report with simulated observation tables, graph, calculations, uncertainty and results.

WORKED EXAMPLE · SIMULATED OBSERVATIONS

A complete example report.

Simulated demonstration data.

This report shows the method and arithmetic. It is not evidence of a physical experiment. Replace its observations with your own measurements when preparing a real lab report.

Student: __________________Student ID: __________________Course: __________________Date: __________________Partner: __________________Instructor: __________________

1. Title and aim

The Acceleration of Gravity by the Coincidence Method (Simple Pendulum & Master Clock). Determine the local acceleration due to gravity g to high metrological precision by measuring the coincidence beat intervals between a variable-length simple pendulum and a standard seconds pendulum.

2. Abstract

Five observations were generated from the ideal teaching model over the settings listed below. A straight-line fit gave an estimate of Acceleration due to gravity g of 9.8068 m s⁻², differing by 0.002% from the model value. The reported scatter comes from scale rounding and any stated model approximation, not measured laboratory noise.

3. Apparatus and fixed settings

4. Theory and graph choice

The coincidence method, pioneered by Jean-Charles de Borda, Pierre-Simon Laplace, and Friedrich Bessel, represents one of the most elegant metrological techniques in experimental physics, serving as a temporal analogue to the mechanical Vernier caliper. When measuring the period T of an oscillating pendulum with an ordinary manual stopwatch, human reaction time uncertainty (typically ±0.15 to ±0.25 s) limits precision, even over 50 or 100 oscillations. In the coincidence method, the test pendulum oscillates alongside a standard master seconds pendulum whose period T₀ is calibrated to 2.00000 s (half-period = 1.00000 s). When both pendulums pass through their central equilibrium vertical fiducial in the same direction simultaneously, a coincidence occurs. Because the period T of the test pendulum differs slightly from T₀, the faster pendulum progressively leads the slower one until, after a large coincidence time interval t_c, it has gained exactly one complete oscillation cycle relative to the master clock. Over this interval, the master clock executes N₀ = t_c / T₀ cycles while the test pendulum executes N = N₀ + 1 = t_c / T cycles. Dividing the timing interval by the elapsed cycles decouples human reaction latency, reducing measurement uncertainty to less than one part in ten thousand (0.01%). By systematically varying the pendulum length L and determining T from coincidence epochs, plotting T² against L yields a straight line with slope S = 4π² / g, from which the acceleration due to gravity g is derived with rigorous metrological accuracy.

T² = (4π² / g) · L

The calculation fits y = mx + b in SI units. The graph may display scaled axes for readability; those display factors are removed before calculating the physical result. The gradient has units s² m⁻¹.

5. Method

  1. Mount the test pendulum on the rigid wall-bracket stand and align the viewing telescope crosshair with the vertical equilibrium index mark shared by both the test pendulum and the master seconds pendulum.
  2. Using the precision cathetometer, measure the total suspended length L from the knife-edge pivot line to the top of the spherical bob, add the bob radius r = d/2, and record the effective length L to the nearest 0.1 mm.
  3. Set the master seconds pendulum into steady oscillation. Displace the test pendulum through a small angle (θ ≤ 2.5°) in the strictly planar direction of swing and release it smoothly from rest without lateral wobble.
  4. Observe through the telescope as both pendulums oscillate. Note the initial transit coincidence where both wires simultaneously cross the crosshair traveling in the same direction (e.g. left to right), and start the chronometer.
  5. Count the intervening swings and record the chronometer reading at the second, third, and fourth consecutive coincidences traveling in the same direction. Compute the mean coincidence interval t_c.
  6. Calculate the high-precision period T = (T₀ · t_c) / (t_c + T₀). Repeat the procedure across five distinct pendulum lengths L from 70.0 cm to 90.0 cm, construct a plot of T² versus L, and determine the acceleration of gravity g from the regression slope.

6. Observations and calculation table

All observations use fixed model settings. Values are rounded only at the instrument reading stage; further calculations use full precision. Repeated physical trials are not claimed.

Table 1. Five simulated measurements; x and y are in SI units.
No.Pendulum Length L (cm)Coincidence Interval t_c (s)x (SI)y (SI)Fitted y (SI)Residual (SI)
170.010.450.700002.818082.817921.6488e-04
275.013.240.750003.019023.01920-1.7889e-04
380.017.470.800003.220433.22048-4.9339e-05
485.024.630.850003.421743.42176-2.4176e-05
590.039.430.900003.623133.623048.7523e-05

Download the sample observations (CSV) ↓

7. Worked calculation for one observation

Pendulum length L = 70.0 cm = 0.7000 m; observed coincidence beat interval t_c = 10.45 s; master clock period T₀ = 2.0000 s. Calculated period T = (T₀ · t_c) / (t_c + T₀) = (2.0000 × 10.45) / (10.45 + 2.0000) = 1.67871 s; period squared T² = 2.818084 s². Single-station gravity estimate g = 4π² L / T² = (4π² × 0.7000) / (2.818084) = 9.8063 m s⁻². Linear regression of T² against L across all length stations yields the reported slope and acceleration of gravity.

8. Graph, gradient and final calculation

2.740.682.980.743.220.803.460.863.700.92Pendulum length L (m)Period squared T² (s²)

Dots show the sample observations. The line is the ordinary least-squares fit.

x̄ = 0.80000; ȳ = 3.22048
Σ(x − x̄)² = 0.02500
Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) = 0.10064
m = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) / Σ(x − x̄)² = 4.02560895
b = ȳ − mx̄ = -7.5634e-06
Slope S = 4.025609 s² m⁻¹; Acceleration due to gravity g = 4π² / S = 4π² / 4.025609 = 9.80682 m s⁻²; Intercept b = -7.5634e-06 s²

9. Uncertainty and comparison

Percentage difference = |estimate − model value| / |model value| × 100 = 0.0017%. Percentage difference is not experimental uncertainty.

For n = 5 observations, Σresidual² = 6.9865e-08; s² = Σresidual²/(n − 2). Gradient standard error = √[s²/Σ(x − x̄)²] = 9.6516e-04. Intercept standard error = √[s²(1/n + x̄²/Σ(x − x̄)²)] = 7.7514e-04.

Propagating only the relevant fit coefficient gives a fit-only standard error of 0.00235 m s⁻². This is a one-standard-error quantity under the regression assumptions. Deterministic rounded model data do not supply a complete physical uncertainty budget.

Optical crosshair coincidence transit detection latency (±0.20 s over multi-cycle interval t_c, scaled down by factor (T/t_c)² ≈ 0.0005 to ~0.0001 s in period T), cathetometer vernier length indexing error (±0.1 mm from knife-edge to bob center of mass), small circular arc amplitude decay (θ ≤ 2.5°, circular arc correction ~0.012%), knife-edge friction and agate plane compliance, ambient air buoyancy reducing apparent gravitational weight by ~0.014%, and virtual hydrodynamic added fluid mass contribute experimental uncertainty. The OLS regression standard error evaluates random scatter across length stations, but does not capture unmodelled buoyancy corrections or knife-edge wear.

10. Result and discussion

g = 9.807 m s⁻² = 9.8068 m s⁻²
Model comparison value: 9.8066 m s⁻²

The observations follow the stated model relationship. Check whether the intercept and residual pattern suggest a systematic offset or a missing approximation. Agreement with the model does not independently verify its input constants.

11. Precautions and limitations

The teaching model assumes an idealized planar simple pendulum with knife-edge suspension. In a physical laboratory, small corrections for the finite radius of the spherical bob, the non-zero mass of the suspension wire, ambient air buoyancy, and support stand compliance must be applied in ultra-high precision gravimetry. The coincidence method provides an extraordinary illustration of phase vernier metrology in experimental physics. By measuring the coincidence interval between the test pendulum and a standard master seconds clock, the period T is determined with a precision of one part in ten thousand, enabling an exceptionally accurate determination of the local acceleration due to gravity g.

12. Conclusion

The worked example illustrates how to obtain Acceleration due to gravity g from measurements, graph variables and a fitted coefficient. The estimate is 9.8068 m s⁻². A real experiment must additionally evaluate the apparatus-specific uncertainties and corrections described above.