Chemistry / Gouy Balance & Magnetic Susceptibility
FREE TO EXPLORE
LABORATORY 46 · NATURAL SCIENCES

Gouy Balance & Magnetic Susceptibility lab report

A worked gouy balance & magnetic susceptibility lab report with gravimetric data tables, linear regression graphs, calculations, uncertainty and conclusions.

WORKED EXAMPLE · QUANTITATIVE OBSERVATIONS

A complete example laboratory report.

Simulated demonstration data.

This report illustrates formal analytical gravimetry, volumetric calibrations, and linear regression analysis. Replace its observations with your own experimental telemetry when preparing a practical submission.

Student: __________________Student ID: __________________Course: __________________Date: __________________Partner: __________________Instructor: __________________

1. Title and aim

Magnetic Susceptibility and Unpaired d-Electrons of Transition Metal Complexes via the Gouy Balance. Determine the mass and molar magnetic susceptibility, effective magnetic moment μ_eff, and number of unpaired d-electrons in hexaaquairon(II) ammonium sulfate (Mohr's salt) using a calibrated Gouy magnetic balance.

2. Abstract

The magnetostatic force and magnetic susceptibility of analytically pure hexaaquairon(II) ammonium sulfate (Mohr's salt, [Fe(H₂O)₆](NH₄)₂(SO₄)₂·6H₂O, M = 392.14 g/mol) were investigated at 25.0 °C (298.15 K) using a calibrated Gouy magnetic balance and a water-cooled variable-field electromagnet with 50 mm flat-tapered pole pieces. A uniform microcrystalline powder sample (m_s = 2.500 g) was packed into a precision cylindrical Pyrex tube (inner diameter 4.00 mm) to a calibrated column height h = 50.00 mm. The sample tube was suspended from an analytical microbalance such that its lower boundary rested precisely at the central axis of the magnetic pole gap while its upper meniscus extended into the near-zero fringe field. Six discrete magnetic flux densities spanning B = 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, 1.00, 1.20, and 1.40 T (corresponding to B² = 0.16, 0.36, 0.64, 1.00, 1.44, and 1.96 T²) were established and monitored with a calibrated transverse Hall-effect teslameter. The sample exhibited a strong, positive downward magnetostatic force, registering apparent mass gains increasing monotonically from Δm = 102.312 mg at 0.40 T to Δm = 1253.326 mg at 1.40 T after subtraction of the empty tube diamagnetic blank. Ordinary least-squares regression of Δm against B² yielded an empirical slope S = (m_s · χ_g) / (2·μ₀·g·h) = 639.4521 mg/T² with a Pearson correlation coefficient R² = 1.00000000. Applying the magnetostatic Gouy force formulation extracted a mass magnetic susceptibility χ_g = 25.08 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/g (χ_g(SI) = 3.1521e-07 m³/kg) and an observed molar susceptibility χ_M = 9836.3 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol. Applying Pascal's diamagnetic core correction (|χ_dia| = 230 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol) isolated the corrected paramagnetic molar susceptibility χ_M,corr = 10066.3 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol. Substituting into Curie's law yielded an effective magnetic dipole moment μ_eff = 4.90 μ_B, demonstrating near-perfect agreement within 7.3674e-05% relative deviation from the 4.90 μ_B theoretical spin-only benchmark for high-spin d⁶ Fe²⁺, rigorously proving the presence of four unpaired d-electrons (S = 2) in an octahedral weak-field coordination environment with complete orbital angular momentum quenching.

3. Apparatus and fixed settings

4. Theory and graph choice

The magnetic properties of chemical compounds provide profound, indispensable insight into electronic structure, chemical bonding, oxidation state, and coordination geometry. When placed in a magnetic field, all substances respond through either diamagnetism (repulsion from the field caused by induced orbital currents in closed shells) or paramagnetism (attraction into the field caused by permanent electronic magnetic dipole moments of unpaired electron spins). In transition metal chemistry, the magnitude of the paramagnetic susceptibility directly reveals the number of unpaired d-electrons and discriminates between high-spin and low-spin crystal field ground states. The classic Gouy balance method provides a robust, highly accurate magnetostatic approach for quantifying magnetic susceptibility. A long cylindrical sample of the complex is suspended such that its lower boundary rests in the intense uniform magnetic field B between the flat pole pieces of an electromagnet, while its upper boundary resides in the near-zero fringe field B_0. The resulting vertical magnetic field gradient exerts a downward translational force F_z proportional to the square of the magnetic flux density B². In this investigation, high-spin hexaaquairon(II) ammonium sulfate (Mohr's salt, [Fe(H2O)6](NH4)2(SO4)2·6H2O) is investigated across fields from 0.40 to 1.40 T (B² = 0.16 to 1.96 T²) at 25.0 °C. Linear regression of apparent mass gain Δm against B² extracts the mass and molar magnetic susceptibility, evaluates Pascal's diamagnetic corrections, and determines the effective magnetic moment μ_eff = 4.90 μ_B, confirming the presence of four unpaired d-electrons (S = 2) in accordance with crystal field theory.

\Delta m = \frac{m_s \chi_g}{2 \mu_0 g h} B^2 = S \cdot B^2 \implies \mu_{\text{eff}} = \sqrt{8 T \chi_{M,\text{corr}}} = 4.90\ \mu_B

To rigorously evaluate the magnetostatic Gouy relationship and extract the fundamental mass and molar magnetic susceptibilities of Mohr's salt, the primary analytical graph plots the experimental apparent mass gain Δm (in milligrams) on the dependent Y-axis against the square of the applied magnetic flux density B² (in Tesla squared, T²) on the independent X-axis across the six measurement coordinates (B² = 0.16, 0.36, 0.64, 1.00, 1.44, 1.96 T²). In the Gouy formulation, the vertical magnetic force acting on an elemental volume slice dz of a cylindrical sample of cross-sectional area A and volume susceptibility χ_v in a magnetic field gradient dB/dz is given by dF_z = (A · χ_v / μ₀) · B(z) · (dB/dz) · dz = (A · χ_v / 2μ₀) · d(B²). Integrating from the lower boundary of the sample tube (z = 0, where the field reaches its maximum homogeneous value B) to the upper meniscus (z = h, where the tube extends into the near-zero fringe field B_0 ≈ 0) yields the total integrated vertical force: F_z = (A · χ_v / 2μ₀) · (B² − B_0²) ≈ (A · χ_v / 2μ₀) · B². Expressing the volume susceptibility in terms of the mass susceptibility χ_g and total packed sample mass m_s as χ_v = ρ · χ_g = (m_s / (A · h)) · χ_g, the resulting force is F_z = (m_s · χ_g / (2·μ₀·h)) · B². Equating this magnetostatic downward force to the gravitational force detected by the balance, F_z = g · Δm, yields the direct linear equation: Δm = [ (m_s · χ_g) / (2·μ₀·g·h) ] · B² = S · B². Plotting Δm vs B² linearizes the entire magnetostatic dataset with exceptional statistical fidelity (R² = 1.00000000). The empirical slope S directly yields the gram magnetic susceptibility χ_g without requiring numerical gradient differentiation, while the near-zero Y-intercept (b = -1.4389e-04 mg) validates the efficacy of the empty-tube blank subtraction and confirms the absence of residual ferromagnetic hysteresis in the pole pieces.

5. Method

  1. Finely pulverize high-purity Mohr's salt crystals in an agate mortar to produce a uniform microcrystalline powder (< 100 mesh). Carefully transfer the powder into the clean, dry Gouy tube in small increments of ~5 mm, tapping the tube firmly on a rubber mat after each addition to eliminate air voids and establish uniform packing density up to a height of h = 50.00 ± 0.05 mm. Record net sample mass m_s = 2.500 g.
  2. Suspend the empty Pyrex Gouy tube between the electromagnet pole faces using the phosphor-bronze wire. With the magnet power switched off (B = 0 T), tare the microbalance to 0.0000 g. Energize the electromagnet across field settings (0.40 to 1.40 T) and record the small diamagnetic mass change of the empty tube (Δm_tube) to serve as a baseline blank correction.
  3. Position the calibrated transverse Hall probe at the central horizontal axis between the pole caps where the lower tip of the Gouy tube will hang. Increment the regulated DC current from 2.0 A to 15.0 A to establish target magnetic flux densities B = 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, 1.00, 1.20, and 1.40 T (B² = 0.16, 0.36, 0.64, 1.00, 1.44, and 1.96 T²). Confirm field stability and linearity.
  4. Suspend the packed Mohr's salt tube from the balance arm so that its lower flat base coincides with the central horizontal plane of the pole caps (maximum field B) while its upper powder meniscus resides in the near-zero fringe field (B₀ ≈ 0). Ensure the tube hangs freely without touching the pole faces or draft shield walls. Record the unperturbed initial mass m₀ at B = 0 T.
  5. Apply magnetic fields B = 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, 1.00, 1.20, and 1.40 T sequentially. At each field setting, allow the balance to mechanically damp and equilibrate for 60 seconds, recording the apparent mass m_field. Calculate the net downward paramagnetic mass change Δm = (m_field − m₀) − Δm_tube in milligrams.
  6. Plot Δm (mg) against B² (T²). Execute ordinary least-squares linear regression to determine the empirical slope S = (m_s · χ_g) / (2 μ₀ g h). Convert the mass susceptibility χ_g to molar susceptibility χ_M, apply Pascal's diamagnetic corrections (χ_dia = −230 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol) to isolate paramagnetic molar susceptibility χ_M,corr, and compute the effective magnetic moment μ_eff = 2.828 √(χ_M,corr · T), establishing the number of unpaired d-electrons via the spin-only formula.

6. Observations and calculation table

All gravimetric observations were recorded using a calibrated 4-decimal electronic analytical balance enclosed within a draft shield chamber. Volumetric aliquots were dispensed from a Class A burette. Residuals are computed relative to the ordinary least-squares regression line.

Table 1. Seven simulated gravimetric observations; x and y represent dispensed volume and net mass metrics.
No.Squared Magnetic Flux Density B² (T²)Apparent Mass Change Δm (mg)Squared Magnetic Field B² (T²)Apparent Mass Change Δm (mg)Fitted y (g)Residual (g)
10.2102.31200.1600102.3120102.3122-0.0002
20.4230.20300.3600230.2030230.20260.0004
30.6409.24900.6400409.2490409.2492-0.0002
41.0639.45201.0000639.4520639.45200.0000
51.4920.81101.4400920.8110920.81090.0001
62.01253.32601.96001253.32601253.3260-0.0000

Download the sample observations (CSV) ↓

7. Worked calculation for one observation

Representative Observation — Gouy Magnetic Susceptibility of Mohr's Salt at B = 0.40 T: 1. Magnetostatic Observables & Magnetic Field Settings: Applied magnetic flux density at lower pole boundary: B = 0.40 T. Squared magnetic flux density: x = B² = (0.40 T)² = 0.16 T². Measured apparent mass change: y = Δm = 102.312 mg = 1.0231e-04 kg. Net downward magnetostatic force: F_z = g · Δm = (9.80665 m/s²)(1.0231e-04 kg) = 0.00100334 N = 1003.34 μN. 2. Sample Column Geometry & Physical Constants: Paramagnetic complex: Mohr's salt, [Fe(H₂O)₆](NH₄)₂(SO₄)₂·6H₂O (M = 392.14 g/mol). Net powder sample mass in tube: m_s = 2.500 g = 0.002500 kg. Uniform powder packing height: h = 50.00 mm = 0.05000 m (cross-sectional area A = 0.1257 cm²). Magnetic permeability of free space: μ₀ = 4π × 10⁻⁷ N·A⁻² = 1.25664 × 10⁻⁶ H/m. Ambient thermostatic temperature: T = 298.15 K (25.00 °C). 3. Gouy Force Formulation & Ordinary Least-Squares Fit: Linearized Gouy relation: Δm = [ (m_s · χ_g) / (2·μ₀·g·h) ] · B² + b. Empirical regression slope: S = 639.4521 mg/T² = 6.3945e-04 kg/T². Model predicted apparent mass gain: Δm_pred = S · B² + b = 102.312 mg. Residual mass deviation: Δm_obs − Δm_pred = -2.3600e-04 mg. 4. Magnetic Susceptibility & Unpaired Electron Extraction: Mass magnetic susceptibility: χ_g(SI) = (2·μ₀·g·h·S_kg) / m_s = 3.1521e-07 m³/kg. Mass susceptibility in CGS units: χ_g(cgs) = χ_g(SI) / (4π × 10⁻³) = 2.5084e-05 cm³/g = 25.08 × 10⁻⁶ emu/g. Raw molar susceptibility: χ_M = χ_g(cgs) · M = (2.5084e-05) × (392.14) = 0.0098363 cm³/mol = 9836.3 × 10⁻⁶ emu/mol. Pascal's diamagnetic correction for [Fe(H₂O)₆](NH₄)₂(SO₄)₂: |χ_dia| = 230 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol. Paramagnetic molar susceptibility: χ_M,corr = χ_M + |χ_dia| = 10066.3 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol. Effective magnetic moment: μ_eff = 2.8284 · √(T · χ_M,corr) = 2.8284 · √[(298.15)(0.0100663)] = 4.90 μ_B. Spin-only formula concordance: μ_spin = √[n(n+2)] = √[4(6)] = 4.90 μ_B (n = 4 unpaired d-electrons, high-spin d⁶).

8. Graph, gradient and final calculation

-70.3-0.1303.70.5677.81.11051.91.61426.02.2Squared Magnetic Field B² (T²)Apparent Mass Change Δm (mg)V = 0.16 mL, m = 102.312 gV = 0.36 mL, m = 230.203 gV = 0.64 mL, m = 409.249 gV = 1.0 mL, m = 639.452 gV = 1.44 mL, m = 920.811 gV = 1.96 mL, m = 1253.326 g

Circular markers represent empirical gravimetric observations. The solid line represents the ordinary least-squares linear regression fit.

x̄ = 0.9267 mL; ȳ = 592.5588 g
Σ(x − x̄)² = 2.3277 mL²
Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) = 1488.4740 g·mL
m = Σ(x − x̄)(y − ȳ) / Σ(x − x̄)² = 639.45213369 g/mL
b = ȳ − mx̄ = -1.4389e-04 g
Gouy Force Fit: Δm = 639.45·B² + -1.4389e-04 mg; χ_g = 25.08 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/g; χ_M,corr = 10066.3 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol; μ_eff = 4.90 μ_B

9. Uncertainty and comparison

Percentage difference = |estimate − theoretical value| / |theoretical value| × 100 = 0.0001%.

For n = 7 gravimetric observations, Σresidual² = 2.3599e-07; s² = Σresidual²/(n − 2). Gradient standard error = √[s²/Σ(x − x̄)²] = 1.5920e-04. Intercept standard error = √[s²(1/n + x̄²/Σ(x − x̄)²)] = 1.7776e-04.

Propagating the fit parameters yields an experimental density standard error of 6.0998e-07 μ_B, with an ideal coefficient of determination R² = 1.000000.

In the high-precision determination of mass and molar magnetic susceptibilities and effective magnetic dipole moments via the Gouy balance method, experimental uncertainties and systematic physical perturbations are rigorously quantified across magnetostatic, optomechanical, gravimetric, barometric, and quantum electronic domains: (1) Magnetic Flux Density Measurement, Hall Probe Calibration, and Gap Homogeneity: The magnetic flux density B is measured at the central horizontal plane of the pole caps using a temperature-compensated transverse Hall-effect teslameter calibrated against nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) Gauss standards. Wavelength and field linearity are confirmed across the 0.40 to 1.40 T working range. The Hall probe positioning uncertainty of ±0.20 mm along the vertical z-axis corresponds to a field gradient uncertainty of u(B)/B ≤ 0.15%. Field stability is actively maintained to within ±0.001 T (0.10%) using a constant-current regulated DC power supply (< 0.01% current ripple). (2) Gouy Tube Packing Density Uniformity & Meniscus Boundary Condition: The sample of Mohr's salt is pulverized to < 100 mesh and packed in small increments with uniform tapping to eliminate density gradients and internal air voids. Bulk density variations along the cylinder introduce localized susceptibility fluctuations that average out over the 50.00 mm length to within u(ρ)/ρ ≤ 0.20%. The upper boundary of the sample column is positioned at z = 50.0 mm where the fringe field is B_0 ≤ 0.02 B, satisfying B_0² ≤ 0.0004 B² and introducing less than 0.04% systematic truncation error into the integrated force equation F_z = (A / 2μ₀) χ_v (B² − B_0²). (3) Empty Tube Diamagnetic Correction & Air Susceptibility Compensation: Pyrex glass exhibits a weak temperature-independent diamagnetism (χ_v ≈ −1.1 × 10⁻⁶). The empty tube blank correction (Δm_tube ≈ −0.05 to −0.60 mg across 0.4 to 1.4 T) is measured independently and subtracted from all sample readings, eliminating tube force contributions to within ±0.01 mg. Furthermore, ambient air possesses a small volume paramagnetism due to molecular oxygen (χ_v,air ≈ +0.029 × 10⁻⁶ at 25 °C), which is compensated in the calibration factor β against the primary standard Hg[Co(NCS)₄], introducing a net residual buoyancy uncertainty of less than 0.05%. (4) Pascal's Constants and Diamagnetic Core Corrections: The diamagnetic susceptibility of [Fe(H₂O)₆](NH₄)₂(SO₄)₂ is computed using authoritative Pascal additive constitutive constants: Fe²⁺ (−13 × 10⁻⁶), 6 H₂O (−78 × 10⁻⁶), 2 NH₄⁺ (−26 × 10⁻⁶), and 2 SO₄²⁻ (−80 × 10⁻⁶), summing to χ_dia = −230 ± 5 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol. This correction accounts for approximately 2.3% of the total measured molar susceptibility, with the residual uncertainty in Pascal's constants contributing u(χ_dia) / χ_M ≤ 0.05% to the final magnetic moment. (5) Uncertainty Propagation through the Gouy Force Equation: According to the ISO/IEC Guide 98-3 (GUM), the effective magnetic moment is related to the empirical regression slope S (mg/T²) via μ_eff = 2.8284 · √[ T · ( (2 μ₀ g h M S 10⁻⁶) / (4π 10⁻³ m_s) + |χ_dia| ) ]. Differentiating with respect to the primary variables yields relative sensitivity coefficients: u_r(μ_eff) ≈ (1/2) · √[ (u_r(S))² + (u_r(h))² + (u_r(m_s))² + (u_r(T))² ]. From linear regression across six magnetic flux densities, the slope standard error is s_S = 0.025 mg/T² (relative uncertainty u_r(S) = 0.004%). Combining with sample mass uncertainty (0.0001 g / 2.500 g = 0.004%), packing height uncertainty (0.05 mm / 50.0 mm = 0.10%), temperature uncertainty (0.1 K / 298.15 K = 0.033%), and magnetic field calibration yields a combined relative standard uncertainty of u_c(μ_eff) = 0.12%. For an empirical magnetic moment μ_eff = 4.90 μ_B, the expanded uncertainty at the 95% confidence level (coverage factor k = 2) is U(μ_eff) = ±0.01 μ_B (0.24%), confirming rigorous concordance with the theoretical spin-only benchmark (4.90 μ_B) and proving the high-spin octahedral (t_2g)⁴(e_g)² configuration.

10. Result and discussion

4.90 = 4.90 μ_B
CIPM standard reference value: 4.90 μ_B

The quantitative investigation of hexaaquairon(II) ammonium sulfate (Mohr's salt) using the Gouy magnetic balance provides a classic, rigorous experimental bridge linking macroscopic magnetostatic forces with the microscopic quantum mechanical electronic structure of transition metal complexes. Paramagnetism is an intrinsic property of chemical systems possessing unpaired electronic spins. In an isolated transition metal atom or ion, the five d-orbitals (d_xy, d_yz, d_xz, d_x²-y², d_z²) are degenerate. However, when the iron(II) cation (Fe²⁺, [Ar] 3d⁶) is surrounded by six neutral water ligands in an octahedral coordination geometry ([Fe(H₂O)₆]²⁺), the electrostatic crystal field produced by the ligand lone pairs removes this five-fold orbital degeneracy. The d_x²-y² and d_z² orbitals, pointing directly along the Cartesian axes toward the incoming ligands, experience strong electrostatic repulsion and are destabilized to a higher-energy doubly degenerate set designated e_g. Conversely, the d_xy, d_yz, and d_xz orbitals, oriented between the Cartesian axes, experience minimal direct repulsion and are stabilized into a lower-energy triply degenerate set designated t_2g. The energetic separation between these manifolds is the octahedral crystal field splitting energy, Δ_oct (10 Dq). For a 3d⁶ ion, electron configuration depends critically on the relative magnitudes of the crystal field splitting Δ_oct and the mean inter-electronic spin-pairing energy P (the Coulombic repulsion and exchange cost required to place two electrons into the same spatial orbital). According to the spectrochemical series, water (H₂O) is a weak-field ligand, producing a modest crystal field splitting (Δ_oct ≈ 10,400 cm⁻¹ for [Fe(H₂O)₆]²⁺), which is substantially smaller than the spin-pairing energy (P ≈ 17,600 cm⁻¹). Consequently, the complex is high-spin: electrons occupy the orbitals singly with parallel spins across all five d-orbitals before pairing according to Hund's rule of maximum multiplicity, generating the electronic configuration (t_2g)⁴ (e_g)². This ground state possesses exactly n = 4 unpaired electrons and a total electron spin quantum number S = 4 × (1/2) = 2. In free gaseous ions, both electron spin angular momentum (S) and orbital angular momentum (L) contribute to the total magnetic dipole moment. However, in octahedral coordination complexes of first-row (3d) transition metals, the non-central electrostatic ligand field quenches the orbital angular momentum. The inhomogeneous electric field produced by the six surrounding ligands forces the orbital wavefunctions into real, spatially fixed Cartesian orientations (d_xy, d_yz, d_xz), quenching the orbital motion such that the expectation value of the orbital angular momentum operator vanishes (<L_z> ≈ 0). Under complete orbital quenching, the effective magnetic dipole moment is governed exclusively by the spin-only formula: μ_eff ≈ μ_spin = g_e · √[S(S + 1)] · μ_B = √[n(n + 2)] · μ_B, where g_e ≈ 2.0023 is the free-electron g-factor and μ_B = 9.27401 × 10⁻²⁴ J/T is the Bohr magneton. For n = 4 unpaired electrons, the spin-only model predicts μ_spin = √[4(6)] = √24 = 4.899 μ_B ≈ 4.90 μ_B. In the Gouy balance measurement, the packed Mohr's salt cylinder experienced a powerful downward magnetostatic force when energized in the magnetic gap. Linear regression of apparent mass gain Δm against B² across the range 0.16 to 1.96 T² yielded an empirical slope of S = 639.4521 mg/T² with Pearson correlation coefficient R² = 1.00000000. Substituting sample parameters (m_s = 2.500 g, h = 50.00 mm, g = 9.80665 m/s², μ₀ = 4π × 10⁻⁷ N/A²) into the Gouy force expression extracted an empirical gram magnetic susceptibility of χ_g = 25.08 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/g (χ_g(SI) = 3.1521e-07 m³/kg). Multiplying by the formula mass of Mohr's salt (M = 392.14 g/mol) gave the observed raw molar susceptibility χ_M = 9836.3 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol. To isolate the true paramagnetic response, Pascal's diamagnetic core correction was rigorously applied. All paired electrons in the core shells of Fe²⁺, the closed shells of the ammonium (NH₄⁺) and sulfate (SO₄²⁻) ions, and the coordinated and crystalline water molecules undergo Larmor precession in the applied field, generating an opposing diamagnetic susceptibility. Using standard Pascal constants, the diamagnetic correction was evaluated as χ_dia = −230 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol. Adding this diamagnetic correction yielded the corrected paramagnetic molar susceptibility χ_M,corr = χ_M + |χ_dia| = 10066.3 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol. Applying the fundamental Curie relationship relating molar susceptibility to the effective magnetic dipole moment at T = 298.15 K, μ_eff = √[ (3 k_B T χ_M,corr) / (N_A μ_0 μ_B²) ] = 2.8284 · √(T · χ_M,corr), yielded an experimental magnetic moment of μ_eff = 4.90 μ_B. This experimental value exhibits astonishing concordance with the theoretical spin-only benchmark for high-spin d⁶ Fe²⁺ (4.90 μ_B), with a relative percentage difference of only 7.3674e-05%. This decisive result confirms that [Fe(H₂O)₆]²⁺ exists unambiguously in the high-spin (t_2g)⁴ (e_g)² electronic ground state with exactly four unpaired d-electrons. Had the complex formed a low-spin configuration (t_2g)⁶ (e_g)⁰, as observed in strong-field hexacyanoferrate(II) ([Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻), all electrons would be paired into the t_2g manifold, yielding S = 0 and diamagnetic behavior (Δm < 0). The experimental finding of μ_eff = 4.90 μ_B provides indisputable spectroscopic and magnetochemical proof of crystal field theory in coordination chemistry.

11. Precautions and limitations

['The elementary Gouy formulation assumes an ideal infinite cylinder with B_0 = 0 at the upper boundary; in practice, residual fringe fields (B_0 ≈ 0.015 B) introduce a minor systematic truncation error of ~0.02%.', 'Radial packing inhomogeneities within the 4.00 mm diameter bore produce localized magnetic susceptibility variations that are averaged over the bulk volume.', 'Orbital angular momentum quenching is assumed to be complete in the spin-only approximation; minor spin-orbit coupling (λ ≈ −100 cm⁻¹ for Fe²⁺) introduces a slight temperature-dependent orbital contribution (typically μ_eff ≈ 5.1–5.3 μ_B in single-crystal studies).'] The physical chemistry simulation model evaluates analytically pure Mohr's salt, [Fe(H2O)6](NH4)2(SO4)2·6H2O (M = 392.14 g/mol), at 25.0 °C (298.15 K). Experimental parameters: sample mass m_s = 2.500 g (0.00250 kg), tube inner diameter d = 4.00 mm, powder packing height h = 50.00 mm (0.0500 m), gravitational acceleration g = 9.80665 m/s², magnetic permeability μ_0 = 4π × 10⁻⁷ N/A². Across the six magnetic flux density settings B = [0.40, 0.60, 0.80, 1.00, 1.20, 1.40] T (B² = [0.16, 0.36, 0.64, 1.00, 1.44, 1.96] T²), the measured apparent mass gains are Δm = [102.312, 230.203, 409.249, 639.452, 920.811, 1253.326] mg. Ordinary least-squares regression yields an empirical slope S = 639.4521 mg/T² (6.39452 × 10⁻⁴ kg/T²) and intercept b = −0.0001 mg with Pearson correlation coefficient R² = 0.9999999999998. Applying the Gouy force relation extracts a gram magnetic susceptibility χ_g(SI) = 3.15209 × 10⁻⁷ m³/kg (χ_g(cgs) = 2.50834 × 10⁻⁵ emu/g). Multiplying by molar mass gives raw molar susceptibility χ_M = 0.009836 emu/mol. Applying Pascal's diamagnetic correction for [Fe(H2O)6](NH4)2(SO4)2 (|χ_dia| = 230 × 10⁻⁶ emu/mol) yields the corrected paramagnetic molar susceptibility χ_M,corr = 0.010066 emu/mol. Applying the Curie relation μ_eff = √[8 · T · χ_M,corr] extracts an effective magnetic moment μ_eff = 4.90 μ_B (difference = 0.00007% from the 4.90 μ_B theoretical spin-only benchmark for high-spin d⁶ Fe²⁺), rigorously confirming four unpaired d-electrons.

12. Conclusion

The mass and molar magnetic susceptibilities and effective magnetic moment of hexaaquairon(II) ammonium sulfate (Mohr's salt, [Fe(H₂O)₆](NH₄)₂(SO₄)₂·6H₂O) were determined at 25.0 °C (298.15 K) using a calibrated Gouy magnetic balance across six magnetic flux densities from 0.40 to 1.40 T (B² = 0.16 to 1.96 T²). The apparent mass gain Δm scaled with exquisite linearity against B² (R² = 1.00000000), yielding an empirical slope S = 639.4521 mg/T². The extracted gram susceptibility was χ_g = 25.08 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/g. Applying Pascal's diamagnetic correction (|χ_dia| = 230 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol) established the corrected paramagnetic molar susceptibility χ_M,corr = 10066.3 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol. The effective magnetic dipole moment was extracted as μ_eff = 4.90 μ_B, demonstrating near-perfect agreement within 7.3674e-05% relative deviation from the 4.90 μ_B theoretical spin-only benchmark. Expanded uncertainty analysis (U(μ_eff) = ±0.01 μ_B at 95% confidence) definitively verifies complete orbital angular momentum quenching and proves the high-spin octahedral (t_2g)⁴ (e_g)² configuration with n = 4 unpaired d-electrons, confirming fundamental crystal field splitting and quantum magnetochemistry principles.