Chemical & Process Engineering / Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger
FREE TO EXPLORE
LABORATORY 09 · CHEMICAL & PROCESS ENGINEERING

Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger theory

Understand shell & tube heat exchanger: governing transport equations, heat and mass balances, reaction kinetics, and unit operations.

Chemical engineering transport & equilibrium foundations of Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger.

In chemical refineries, petrochemical manufacturing, and power generation facilities, shell-and-tube heat exchangers represent the workhorse thermal unit operation, accounting for more than 65% of all heat transfer hardware in service. A standard TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) type 1-2 design comprises a cylindrical outer shell housing an internal bundle of parallel tubes; the shell-side fluid flows across the bundle guided by transverse segmental baffles that induce crossflow turbulence, while the tube-side fluid enters a partitioned channel head to make two passes through the tubes. Thermal duty is governed by Newton's law of cooling: q = U · A · (F_T · ΔT_lm), where U is the overall heat transfer coefficient, A is the total outside heat transfer surface area, ΔT_lm is the countercurrent log mean temperature difference, and F_T is the LMTD correction factor that accounts for combined co-current and counter-current passes. In accordance with the Dittus–Boelter and Sieder–Tate correlations for turbulent tube flow, the tube-side convective heat transfer coefficient h_i scales with Reynolds number to the 0.8 power (h_i ∝ v^0.8 ∝ V_h^0.8). In this laboratory investigation, an instrumented 1-2 shell-and-tube heat exchanger is operated across tube flow rates from 4.0 to 24.0 L/min at constant shell-side utility flow to evaluate U, verify Re^0.8 scaling, and map heat transfer effectiveness ε.

U = S · (V_h)^0.8 = 85.0000 · (V_h)^0.8

1. Fundamental Principles of Recuperative Heat Transfer

Heat exchangers facilitate the transfer of thermal energy between two or more process streams at different temperatures without direct physical mixing. The tubular shell-and-tube heat exchanger remains the dominant design in chemical process industries due to its robust mechanical integrity, high pressure/temperature ratings, and ease of cleaning.

2. Thermal Duty & The Log Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD)

The total heat transfer rate $q$ transferred from hot process fluid to cold utility fluid is expressed by the integral rate equation:

\[ q = U A \Delta T_m \]

where $U$ is the overall heat transfer coefficient, $A$ is the heat exchange area, and $\Delta T_m$ is the effective mean temperature difference. For idealized pure counter-current flow with constant heat capacities and negligible ambient heat loss, integration along the length yields the logarithmic mean temperature difference (LMTD):

\[ \Delta T_{lm} = \frac{\Delta T_1 - \Delta T_2}{\ln(\Delta T_1 / \Delta T_2)} \]

where $\Delta T_1 = T_{h,in} - T_{c,out}$ and $\Delta T_2 = T_{h,out} - T_{c,in}$.

3. The Multi-Pass LMTD Correction Factor $F_T$

In a 1-2 shell-and-tube heat exchanger (1 shell pass, 2 tube passes), fluid in one pass moves co-currently with the shell stream, while fluid in the second pass moves counter-currently. Consequently, the true effective temperature driving force is less than pure counter-current $\Delta T_{lm}$:

\[ \Delta T_m = F_T \cdot \Delta T_{lm} \]

where $F_T$ is the dimensionless correction factor calculated from dimensionless temperature ratios $P$ and $R$:

\[ P = \frac{T_{t,out} - T_{t,in}}{T_{s,in} - T_{t,in}}, \quad R = \frac{T_{s,in} - T_{s,out}}{T_{t,out} - T_{t,in}} \] \[ F_T = \frac{\sqrt{R^2 + 1} \ln\left( \frac{1 - P}{1 - P R} \right)}{(R - 1) \ln\left( \frac{2 - P(R + 1 - \sqrt{R^2 + 1})}{2 - P(R + 1 + \sqrt{R^2 + 1})} \right)} \]

4. Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient & Convective Scaling

The overall thermal resistance $1 / UA$ sums individual convective, conduction, and fouling resistances:

\[ \frac{1}{U_o A_o} = \frac{1}{h_i A_i} + \frac{R_{f,i}}{A_i} + \frac{\ln(r_o/r_i)}{2\pi k L} + \frac{R_{f,o}}{A_o} + \frac{1}{h_o A_o} \]

In clean tubes, internal convective resistance dominates. From the Dittus–Boelter equation for turbulent tube flow ($Nu = 0.023 Re^{0.8} Pr^{0.4}$), the inside film coefficient scales as $h_i \propto v^{0.8} \propto V_h^{0.8}$. Under constant shell-side conditions, the overall heat transfer coefficient $U$ follows the linear model:

\[ U = S \cdot (V_h)^{0.8} \]

where $S$ is the convective transport sensitivity slope.

Viva voce questions & analytical theory

Why is the LMTD correction factor F_T necessary for multi-pass shell-and-tube exchangers?

In multi-pass exchangers, fluid flows counter-current in one pass and co-current in the other; F_T (< 1.0) mathematically corrects the pure counter-current LMTD for the less thermally efficient co-current pass and crossflow mixing.

What is temperature cross in a heat exchanger and why does it impact F_T?

Temperature cross occurs when the cold fluid outlet temperature exceeds the hot fluid outlet temperature; in multi-pass units, extreme temperature cross causes F_T to plunge below 0.75, risking thermal inefficiency or design unfeasibility.

How do segmental baffles enhance shell-side heat transfer?

Baffles force shell fluid to flow perpendicularly across the tube bundle in zigzag crossflow, promoting boundary layer disruption, turbulent eddy shedding, and preventing fluid stratification and stagnant dead zones.

What are the individual thermal resistances that make up the overall resistance 1/UA?

1/UA = 1/(h_i A_i) + R_f,i/A_i + ln(r_o/r_i)/(2π k L) + R_f,o/A_o + 1/(h_o A_o), comprising tube-side convection, internal fouling, wall conduction, external fouling, and shell-side convection.

Why does the tube-side heat transfer coefficient scale with flow rate as V_h^0.8?

In fully developed turbulent pipe flow, the Dittus–Boelter correlation establishes Nu = 0.023 Re^0.8 Pr^0.4; because Re is directly proportional to velocity and volumetric flow rate, h_i scales with V_h^0.8.

How does the ε-NTU method differ conceptually from the LMTD method in heat exchanger analysis?

LMTD is convenient for sizing an exchanger when all terminal temperatures are known; ε-NTU is superior for performance rating existing exchangers when outlet temperatures are unknown and must be predicted from fluid flow rates.

Experimental precautions and process safety

  • Maintain shell-side cooling utility flow strictly constant at 15.0 L/min to isolate tube-side velocity dependence.
  • Ensure steady state is achieved at each flow plateau before logging temperatures (verify heat balance closure within 5%).
  • Insulate all external piping spools to minimize parasitic heat loss to ambient laboratory air.
  • Check for air binding in the top shell compartment; vent trapped air through the top shell bleeder valve.

Theoretical assumptions & boundary condition limits

  • The transport and thermodynamic models apply within the specified calibrated operating window (4.0 to 24.0 L/min).
  • Assumes ideal continuum flow and homogeneous phase mixing without unmodeled parasitic wall losses.
  • Continuous sensor readings reflect ordinary least-squares regression across successive observations.
  • High-temperature or extreme concentration excursions require non-ideal equation-of-state corrections.
↳
Connect transport theory to empirical process plant data.

Evaluated using a 1-pass shell, 2-pass tube exchanger containing 16 stainless steel tubes (OD 12.7 mm, length 1.2 m, area A = 0.766 m^2) with 25% cut segmental baffles. Linear regression models U versus (V_h)^0.8.